Friday, December 09, 2005

Obesity in the Avenues

In today's Salt Lake Tribune:
Heaviest Utahns live in Rose Park; leanest in Aves

Age and women's education were the only factors statistically linked to areas' obesity rates. Those two factors accounted for about half of the difference between the most and least obese areas, Larsen said.
"It's very interesting because you would think income would have something to do with it," she said. "My intuitive sense is that a higher proportion of college-educated women means they're more likely to be physically active and perhaps take care of their spouse differently, but we really aren't sure why that was a factor."

1 Comments:

At Fri Dec 09, 12:08:00 PM, Simon said...

Not sure where you are going with this, but does this help?

United States
Children Ages 6 to 11

Obesity rate
Black..........35.9%
Hispanic......39.3%
White.........26.2%

Source: CDC, National Center for Health Statistics, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Wednesday, December 07, 2005

Cognitive dissonance and one effort to fight it

Past a certain point (say, beyond the genetic predisposition idea), I am not willing to concede that obesity is out of the control of the individual. Yes its causes are complex and interrelated, yes you can get addicted to sugar/fat/comfort foods. But for God's sake take some ownership for your own health. Morford, as usual, puts it best:
know, it's not a simple problem. I know obesity is a terribly complicated issue, crosses myriad sociocultural lines, is more than merely too much unhealthy food coupled with too much laziness coupled with too much I'm-a-victim thinking coupled with lack of self-control coupled with lack of exercise coupled with lack of decent health education coupled with lousy upbringing coupled with sinister garbage-food corporate marketing coupled with increasingly sedentary TV-addicted lifestyles coupled with pain-avoidance mechanisms coupled with believing it's all up to the Big Pharmcos to merely invent a magic bullet to cure it all. Oh wait, check that, it's not more than that at all. That's exactly what it is.

That is exactly what it is. And most of those factors can be either completely controlled by the individual or strongly mitigated.

On a more promising front: The Center for Science in the Public Interest is going after the big soda manufacturers in order to get them to stop suckering schools into exclusive vending contracts that 1) end up not generating that much revenue for the individual school and 2) amount to unfair and deceptive marketing practices. I say: go get 'em.

1 Comments:

At Fri Dec 09, 01:29:00 AM, Simon said...

Well that's certainly glib. I don't know anyone that would say that obesity is out of the control of the individual, but take that individual and put them in a different environment and their weight may well be different.
Let me put the math this way, two 18 years old candidates find themselves at 150% of the weight at which you would hire them. They both put in the same effort of exercise and calorie reductiona and after three months A has met your threshold but B is still at 120%, is it fair to hire A but not B?
Let's flip the timeframe around. Imagine at your annual checkup the doctor reveals that you have a 25% greater risk that average of your liver crapping out before you die. Are you ethically obliged to your fellow premium payers never to let another drop of Wild Turkey or pale ale pass your lips? Should your employer force you to teetotal?

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Friday, December 02, 2005

Obesity, health insurance, and the Corporation

(Regarding a post from last July)
Blue Cross of California said...
Krugman has a great discussion on obesity and health care. The discussion is very interesting as obesity can lead to higher cost in health insurance.

So true. And as a direct result, corporations (e.g. Wal-Mart and its now-famous memo) are looking for ways to reduce their costs by screening for healthier employees when hiring. Is this an unethical practice - that is, employment discrimination against obese people?

Does it provide incentives for people to stay/become healthier?

Would it be analogous to screen for smokers?

1 Comments:

At Sat Dec 03, 06:58:00 PM, Simon said...

Yeah it's unethical. The assumption here is that as being overweight and smoking are a choice, it's fine to discriminate, but people from some places and in some environmaents, are more likely to make that choice. Let's take candidate X for a job, X is an 18 year old, qualified, uh, to work at Walmart. X smokes but perhpas she falls into that 30% margin who wouldn't smoke if her parents made another $10k a year.
On a side note, Medicare is no
Anyway, it has been suggested that the whole premise might be off, all your smoking/overeating employees work for 50 years and then die of CHF at 63, saving you millions on pensions. Cha-ching!

PS Free will is an illusion anyway

 

Post a Comment

<< Home