Liberal Federalism (Or The Balkanizing of the Empire)
I've been meaning to post this link for a long time. Dan Kemmis, former mayor of Missoula and Speaker of the House in Montana, has advocated for a regional-type federalism, along the lines of Kirpatrick Sale's ideas of bioregional autonomy (but without the economic and cultural isolation implicit in Sale's vision).
Secession of the Colorado Plateau is something I've half-facetiously advocated for years now; whether those are the right (no pun intended) lines to draw or not is less the issue than if, essentially, a Balkanization of the U.S. is inevitable and/or desirable.
From slate.com
Federalism doesn't suit the typical liberal's self-image, but one of the most persuasive defenders of decentralizing political power was that ultimate object of liberal cosmopolitan admiration (and conservative scorn), a French intellectual: Alexis de Tocqueville argued that the strength and dynamism of American democracy were found in its local communities. He was right: Local and state governments can be more innovative, daring, and proactive—in short, more progressive—than even the liberal Congresses of distant memory. A growing number of state courts and legislatures have pioneered public-school finance reform, working to ensure that kids from poor neighborhoods are not stuck in inferior schools. Many states have civil rights guarantees that are stronger than those under federal law, especially with respect to sexual orientation discrimination, which federal law does not prohibit.

2 Comments:
How long, historically speaking, have empires lasted?
What has precipitated their demise?
When we look at the physical and political forms of civilization over the course of human history, how much of it has flourished during empire, and how much of it has suffered?
Humans are their best - the most compassionate, inquisitive, creative, and open to other cultures - when they operate within a certain scale. Plato advocated for communities of around 5,000 people; whether or not that is reasonable now remains debatable.
States and smaller government (or non-government) entities can definitely be more effective, at least in terms of day-to-day quality of life issues like social and environmental well-being. "Anonymous" talks about Plato's desirable scale: it's the human scale.
However, I don't see how you could possibly go back, and am not sure if A is attacking 'empire' - which actually has fostered some amazing innovations - or simply quizzing us. (Are you a Morgenthaler?)
Why can't we have multiple levels, and work to make them more effective? As to secession, the surrounding states would make life a living hell. What options? we'd probably find fault with Colorado, but what about Moab joining Oregon or Washington? They seem to be right-thinkers, so to speak...
Seriously, having just been in a city with 5 pockmarked layers of government, where 30 separate city organs will toy with our 1-day event before passing it on to the next level - lateral, personality-based infrastructure is no picnic either. arrogance, insecurity and xenophobia run all the way to the individual - if we can figure out how to erase those, we'll have a start.
lt
Post a Comment
<< Home